How to Build Your Secret Sauce: A Practical Guide for Aspiring VCs

Before you can build secret sauce, you need to know where you're starting from. Most aspiring VCs skip this step and jump straight into activity: attending events, taking coffee meetings, reading newsletters. Then they wonder why, two years later, they still can't articulate a credible edge.

The Secret Sauce Audit forces you to confront reality.

What industries have you worked in? For how long? At what level? What founders, operators, or executives do you already know, and in which sectors? What communities or ecosystems are you already embedded in? Have you made any angel investments, and what were the outcomes? Have you ever helped a startup in a meaningful, measurable way?

If a founder in your target sector asked "why should I take your money or advice?", what would you say? If an LP asked "what evidence do you have that you can generate returns?", what would you show them? If a fund manager asked "what value would you add to our team?", what's your answer?

If you struggle with these questions, that's useful information. It tells you exactly what you need to build.

Once you've completed your audit, look for patterns. This is the step most aspiring VCs miss entirely.

Review everything you documented: your operator experience, your network, your investments, your founder support. Now ask yourself three questions:

Stage: Where have your wins concentrated? Have you been most helpful to pre-seed founders figuring out product-market fit? Seed-stage companies scaling their first sales team? Series A companies building out leadership? Your best contributions likely cluster around a particular stage.

Sector: What industries keep showing up? Maybe your healthcare background led you to help three healthtech startups. Maybe your fintech network means most of your angel investments landed in payments companies. The pattern matters more than any single data point.

Geography: Where are the founders you've helped located? Are they concentrated in a specific city, region, or ecosystem? Geographic patterns often reflect where your network is strongest.

Write down what you find. Be specific: "Most of my wins have been with pre-seed B2B fintech founders in the Midwest" is useful. "I've helped startups" is not.

Now comes the fork in the road. You have two options:

If your audit reveals a clear pattern of success in a specific stage, sector, and geography, the fastest path forward is usually to go deeper. You already have credibility here. You already have relationships. You already have proof points.

Doubling down means: targeting more founders in that same intersection, building visibility in the communities where those founders gather, and stacking more wins on top of your existing track record.

This is the lower-risk path. You're building on a foundation that already exists.

Sometimes your audit reveals that your existing wins don't align with where you actually want to invest. Maybe your track record is in enterprise SaaS, but you're genuinely passionate about climate tech. Maybe your network is concentrated in one geography, but you want to invest globally.

Pivoting means: acknowledging that you're starting closer to zero in your new focus area, being realistic about the timeline (12 to 24 months to build credible edge from scratch), and committing fully to the new direction rather than straddling both.

This is the higher-risk path. But if your heart isn't in your existing edge, doubling down on it will feel like a slog and your lack of enthusiasm will show.

Ask yourself: Can I see myself spending the next 10 to 15 years deeply immersed in this stage, sector, and geography? If the answer is yes for your existing edge, double down. If the answer is no, pivot now before you invest more time building in the wrong direction.

There's no wrong answer here. But there is a wrong approach: refusing to choose. Trying to build edge across multiple stages, sectors, and geographies simultaneously is the surest way to build no edge at all.

Based on your audit and your strategic decision, you likely fall into one of four starting positions. Each has a different optimal path to secret sauce.

You spent 5+ years in a specific industry. You know the problems, the players, and the trends. Your fastest path is building proprietary deal flow. Founders in your sector should seek you out because you understand their market better than generalist investors.

You know many people across industries but lack deep expertise in any one area. Your fastest path is supporting founders. Pick a thesis area (informed by the patterns you identified) and help 10 to 15 companies create measurable value. Your network becomes valuable when it's focused and you can point to outcomes.

You have money to invest but limited operating background. Your fastest path is building an investment track record. Small angel checks in a focused thesis area will teach you faster than any course.

Limited capital, network, and experience. Your fastest path is supporting founders. You can't write big checks, but you can outwork everyone else in helping companies succeed. Track your contributions obsessively.

Proprietary deal flow is often the most valuable form of secret sauce. When founders seek you out before they seek institutional capital, you get earlier access to better deals at better prices. That's a structural advantage that compounds over time.

Your deal flow can only be proprietary if it's concentrated. Pick a specific intersection of sector, stage, and geography.

Bad: "I want deal flow in tech startups."

Better: "I want deal flow in B2B fintech infrastructure at pre-seed."

Best: "I want to be the first call for founders building payment orchestration tools for mid-market companies."

Map where founders in this space congregate. What accelerators do they go through? What communities do they participate in? Who are the angels already active here?

You can't be everywhere. Pick two to three places where your target founders gather and become impossible to ignore: Slack communities, Twitter/X, accelerator mentorship programs, or industry events.

Visibility means consistently showing up and adding value. Not lurking. Actively contributing insights, making introductions, and helping founders before they're raising.

A lot of good deal flow can come inbound. Founders seek you out because you offer something they can't get elsewhere. This could be content that demonstrates expertise, a reputation for actually helping, or access to something scarce like potential customers or downstream investors.

For every inbound opportunity, track: date of first contact, how they found you, quality score, outcome, and follow-on rounds raised.

After 12 months, you should be able to say: "I saw 47 deals in payment infrastructure last year. 68% were inbound. Of the companies I passed on, 12 raised Series A rounds."

Going too broad ("fintech deal flow" is not proprietary). Confusing visibility with value. Not tracking inbound vs outbound. Expecting results too fast (proprietary deal flow takes 12 to 24 months to build).

If you don't have capital to deploy or deep operator experience, supporting founders is often the fastest path to credible edge. But "helping startups" is not secret sauce. Measurable impact on company outcomes is.

Every company you support should fit within your investment focus (the stage, sector, and geography you chose). You cannot build edge by helping random startups across random sectors.

Find early-stage companies in your thesis area that could genuinely benefit from your help. Look for companies where your specific skills, knowledge, or network could create measurable value.

Sources include accelerator portfolios, AngelList, Product Hunt, founder communities, and warm introductions.

"Let me know how I can help" is useless. Founders hear it constantly.

Bad: "I'd love to help however I can."

Better: "I saw you're hiring a head of sales. I know three people who might be a fit. Want intros?"

Best: "I noticed you're targeting mid-market CFOs. I spent six years selling to that persona. I helped another startup shorten their sales cycle by 40% with a similar approach. Happy to review your process."

This is where most aspiring VCs fail. They help companies but never document the impact.

For every company you support, track: type of support provided, specific actions taken, measurable outcomes (revenue influenced, hires placed, valuation jumps), and founder testimonials.

After 12 to 18 months, you should be able to say: "I've supported 14 companies in B2B fintech. I've made 47 customer introductions that resulted in 11 pilots and $340K in ARR. This contributed to companies raising a follow-on round at an average 2x markup."

Helping companies outside your thesis. Not asking for documentation (founders won't proactively write testimonials; you have to ask). Offering generic help. Counting activity instead of outcomes ("I had 30 calls with founders" is not edge; "I helped close $500K in ARR" is edge).

Track your progress monthly. This forces accountability and gives you quantifiable evidence over time.

Total deals seen this month (in thesis area). Inbound deals (founders who sought you out). Inbound percentage. Quality deals (would seriously consider investing).

Companies actively supporting. Introductions made this month. Introductions that converted to outcomes. Measurable impact created (revenue, hires, pilots).

Investments made to date. Total capital deployed. Portfolio companies with markups. Portfolio companies that raised follow-on.

Review monthly. If the numbers aren't moving, your activity isn't converting to edge.

Define your thesis. Complete your audit. Identify patterns in your wins. Make your strategic decision (double down or pivot). Map your ecosystem. Start tracking everything.

By the end: a clear investment focus, a target list, and a tracking system.

Deepen relationships with 5 to 10 founders in your chosen focus area. Make your first measurable contributions. Build visibility through content or community.

By the end: two to three documented examples of impact and early deal flow data.

Expand to 10 to 15 companies. Track inbound deal flow percentage. Document outcomes and gather testimonials.

By the end: quantifiable impact across multiple companies and 25%+ inbound deal flow.

Your track record and reputation generate inbound opportunities. You can articulate your secret sauce with specific numbers. That's a fund thesis. Or a compelling VC job application.

Secret sauce is not mysterious. It's focused effort, tracked over time, in a specific thesis area.

Start with an honest audit. Identify patterns in your wins across stage, sector, and geography. Make the strategic decision: double down or pivot. Then go deep on deal flow or founder support. Track everything. Review monthly and adjust.

The aspiring VCs who build credible edge are not smarter than everyone else. They're more focused and more disciplined about measuring their progress.

Ready to build your edge? Learn more about Venture Institute and start your journey with structured guidance and a global community of aspiring investors.