- **0% recycling**
- Lowest complexity and most LP-friendly
- No per-LP recycled-capacity tracking or recall mechanics
- Distributions go back to LPs, which can make Fund I fundraising easier
- But you give up potential extra deployable capital
- **20% recycling**
- Increases effective investable capital if you have early realizations during the investment period
- Can support more follow-ons or a few additional new checks
- But requires careful **LP-by-LP** accounting after each distribution and capital call
- More likely to invite LP questions or negotiation, especially in smaller first funds
- **LP reaction**
- **10% to 20%** is common; **25%** is considered ambitious
- First-time/smaller seed funds often choose **0%** for simplicity
References:
-
https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/164023-what-is-the-practical-difference-between-a-recycled-amount-of-0-10-and-20-for-a-small-fund
- https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/163618-how-do-managers-track-recycled-amount-capacity-per-lp-and-when-is-0-recycling-right-for-a-10m-fund