.jpg)
The dominant narrative around emerging venture capital over the past several years has been one of contraction. Emerging managers were described as facing their worst fundraising environment in modern VC history, with LP capital consolidating around established firms and new managers struggling to fill even modest targets. The emerging manager performance data tracked by Decile Group tells a more nuanced and in many ways more encouraging story.
Drawn from over 1,000 PACTs, over 1,000 LPAs, and more than 900 funds tracked through VC Lab, this data does not show a category in decline. It shows a category accelerating, with clear and measurable patterns distinguishing managers who close from those who struggle.
This article covers:
- Current fundraising momentum and what it means for managers raising now
- Indicators associated with early traction in the first four weeks
- Factors that distinguish funds reaching a first close from those that do not
- Where LP capital is concentrating in 2026
- The structural shift toward specialist funds and a new generation of managers
Emerging Manager Performance: Record-Breaking Momentum
The most recent emerging manager performance data makes a striking case against the downturn narrative. The four months from February to May 2026 ranked among the top five months in fundraising volume recorded across the past four years. This was not driven by a single outlier month or a handful of large closes. It was a sustained pattern across consecutive months.
Each of those four months recorded between 1.2x and 2.2x higher fundraising volume than the same month in 2025. Critically, 2025 was itself a strong year for emerging VC fundraising, which makes the scale of the 2026 increase more significant. The year-on-year gap also widened across the period, suggesting growth is compounding rather than plateauing.
Sequential month-on-month data reinforces the picture. Each of the four months recorded between 1.1x and 1.9x higher volume than the month immediately preceding it. Sustained month-on-month acceleration of this kind is the clearest available indicator that emerging VC fundraising is in an upswing rather than a brief rebound. For managers currently raising, the data suggests LP appetite is at its most receptive level in at least four years.
Emerging Manager Performance: Early Traction Indicators
Understanding what is associated with early fundraising success matters as much as understanding the overall environment. Analysis of 600+ emerging funds identified five factors with statistically significant correlations with the amount of soft commitments received in the first four weeks of fundraising:
- Target fund size (r = .22, p < .001)
- LinkedIn followers (r = .19, p < .001)
- Prior angel investments (r = .18, p < .001)
- Prior VC experience (r = .12, p < .01)
- Number of LP pitches (r = .09, p < .05)
These are correlations, not causes. Individually they are relatively modest, but all are statistically significant, and the data suggests it is the combination of visibility, credibility, and preparation that is associated with early traction rather than any single factor in isolation.
Fund size deserves particular attention as the relationship with early performance is not straightforward. Among managers who raised nothing in their first four weeks, the average fund target was $9.5MM. Among those who raised between $150K and $500K, the average target was closer to $5.5MM. For managers still building network and credibility, leaner targets are more strongly associated with early LP interest.
The picture at the top end is different. Managers who raised over $2MM in their first four weeks averaged a $19.9MM fund target, but they also averaged 6-10 prior angel investments, prior VC exposure in most cases, and had typically pitched 51-100 LPs. Larger targets appear to be associated with stronger early performance when backed by a solid foundation of experience, network, and preparation.
Emerging Manager Performance: First Close Indicators
Analysis of nearly 700 emerging funds examined what distinguishes funds that reach a first close from those that remain stuck in fundraising. Several commonly assumed factors showed no meaningful difference between the two groups. GP age, team composition, and LP pitching volume were all statistically indistinguishable between closed and struggling funds. Solo GPs lead 61% of closed funds and 60% of funds still working toward a close. Volume of LP outreach alone is not associated with better outcomes.
What does distinguish closed funds is a clearer set of factors:
- Prior angel experience. Managers of closed funds average 6-10 prior angel investments, compared to 3-5 for struggling funds. A track record of angel investing appears to signal judgment and network access to LPs.
- Prior VC experience. Around 60% of GPs in closed funds reported prior VC experience, compared to 50% among struggling funds. Familiarity with venture processes and LP expectations appears to be associated with more effective fundraising.
- LinkedIn presence. Managers of closed funds trended toward over 2,000 LinkedIn followers, while struggling funds trended closer to 1,000-2,000. Broader professional visibility is associated with warmer introductions and stronger LP credibility.
- Seed-stage focus. Closed funds were 1.3x more likely to focus on seed-stage investing, at 58% of closed funds compared to 44% of struggling funds. Venture studio and accelerator models were 2-4x more common among funds still working toward a close.
- Early momentum. Funds that reached a first close secured an average of $3.6MM in soft commitments within their first six months, 1.9x more than funds still fundraising. Early soft commitment momentum appears to build LP confidence and support subsequent closes.
LP Capital Concentration in Emerging VC
Beyond overall performance trends, the composition of LP capital in Q1-Q2 2026 reveals where investor interest is concentrating. Almost 90% of LP commitments went to funds targeting below $15MM. Seed-stage funds captured around 70% of commitments. AI, deeptech, and healthcare led sector allocation, while only around 11% of funds receiving commitments were generalist.
The average LP check size across the dataset was $159K, consistent with an LP base predominantly composed of high-net-worth individuals and family offices. Check size performance varied meaningfully:
- Checks between $150K and $250K converted into signed LPAs at 1.2x-2.4x higher rates than other check size ranges, making them the most reliable in terms of conversion
- Checks below $50K converted into LPA amounts averaging 119% of their original PACT value on average, the highest value retention of any check size range
- Checks above $250K were associated with lower conversion rates and slower timelines, consistent with longer diligence and approval processes typical of larger institutional commitments
The Rise of the Specialist Emerging Manager
One of the most significant structural shifts in emerging manager performance data is who is launching funds and how they are positioning them. Generalist funds declined to 11.2% of launches in 2025, down from 14.9% in prior years, while specialist funds have become the clear majority across the ecosystem. The shift toward sector-focused strategies is not a niche trend. It is the new norm.
The managers behind these funds are also changing. The share of emerging managers with prior VC experience declined to 50.4% in 2025, down from 58.1% in prior years, as more professionals enter venture from adjacent fields. While the performance data shows that prior experience is an advantage, it also shows that a lack of direct VC experience is not a barrier to closing a fund. What matters is deep and specialized knowledge about the investment sector, whether that comes from operating experience, domain expertise, or a focused angel investing track record.
The demographic and structural profile of this new generation of specialist managers reflects a clear pattern:
- Managers under 40 represented 38.4% of fund leaders in 2025, up from 31% in prior years
- Within similar timeframes, younger managers close up to 1.7x more capital than managers in the 40-50 and over-50 age groups
- 58.4% of funds set targets below $10MM in 2025, up from 51.8% in prior years
- Sub-$2MM funds are 2-2.5x more likely to reach a first close than funds targeting $2MM-$15MM
Takeaway
The emerging manager performance data does not support the contraction narrative. Fundraising momentum is at a four-year high, and the funds showing the strongest performance are those with specialist focus, credible experience, realistic targets, and early soft commitment momentum. LP capital is concentrating in lean, sector-focused, seed-stage funds, and a new generation of managers from adjacent industries is closing capital effectively.
For managers building or preparing to launch a fund in this environment, the emerging manager performance data offers a clear signal: focus beats breadth, and early momentum compounds into closed capital. VC Lab has helped over 900 funds navigate exactly this process. For managers who want to go deeper into the data, the full research series is available at govclab.com/vc-research.