1

The Advisory Committee owes no fiduciary duty and takes no part in management, yet can approve conflicts of interest — what is the practical difference between AC approval and Majority in Interest consent?

1 See in Base
0
Practical difference:

- **Advisory Committee approval**
- Consent from a **small subset** of LPs
- Used for **narrow, situational oversight** or administrative matters
- Faster, but less representative
- LPAC members usually owe **no fiduciary duty** and may themselves be conflicted

- **Majority in Interest consent**
- Approval by LPs holding the required **economic interest** in the fund
- Better for **fund-wide conflicts, major waivers, or governance changes**
- More legitimate and LP-protective in principle
- Slower and heavier operationally

So in practice, AC approval is a **committee-level check**; Majority in Interest is an **owner-level mandate**.

References:
- https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/163750-why-does-the-advisory-committee-owe-no-fiduciary-duty
-
https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/165064-why-did-cornerstone-v3-move-conflict-of-interest-approval-from-the-advisory-committee-to-a-majority-in-interest-of-lps

Join VC Lab

Raising your first fund? VC Lab has helped launch 950+ venture firms, with no fees and no equity taken. The average Start Fund reaches first close in 58 days.
Apply Now