Already an Angel? You can become a VC, and we'll invest in your fund. Learn how Sept 15.
Save My Free Seat
1

The exact legal threshold that separates poor fund performance from "Malfeasance" when LPs attempt to trigger a General Partner removal or clawback

The exact legal threshold that separates poor fund performance from "Malfeasance" when LPs attempt to trigger a General Partner removal or clawback
1 See in Base
0
There is usually **no exact legal line based on poor returns alone**. In most VC funds:

- **Poor performance** by itself usually does **not** justify GP removal.
- **Malfeasance** depends on the **LPA definition** and often requires serious conduct such as:
- fraud
- bad faith
- willful misconduct
- gross negligence
- violation of law
- breach of the LPA

In the Cornerstone Start Agreement, **Malfeasance** is defined only if determined by a **final non-appealable court judgment**. So the practical threshold is not “bad investing,” but **proven misconduct** under the contract.

For LP clawbacks or GP removal, always check the exact LPA language, vote thresholds, notice, and cure provisions.

References:
- https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/28283-what-is-the-cornerstone-start-agreement
-
https://decilehub.com/base/1-general_questions/163683-when-can-the-gp-be-removed

Join VC Lab

Raising your first fund? VC Lab has helped launch 950+ venture firms, with no fees and no equity taken. The average Start Fund reaches first close in 58 days.
Apply Now