Deal-by-deal vs whole-of-fund distribution waterfall in Cornerstone: what's the practical trade-off for emerging managers?
Section 3.2 of the Cornerstone LPA offers two bracketed options for the interim distribution waterfall: Deal-by-Deal Distribution (Carried Interest is paid out investment-by-investment once that specific investment returns its own capital) versus Whole-of-Fund Distribution (100% of distributions go to LPs first until they've recouped their entire aggregate Capital Contributions across all investments, before any Carried Interest is paid on any deal). For an emerging manager raising a first fund: (1) which structure do institutional or anchor LPs typically expect or push for, and why? (2) what is the real economic/timing difference for the GP - does deal-by-deal let the GP get paid carry much earlier even if later deals in the portfolio go on to lose money? (3) is a GP clawback (Section 6.4.2) more likely to actually get triggered under a deal-by-deal structure than under whole-of-fund?