Has the fundraising downturn narrative been wrong all along?
Fundraising in emerging VC is blowing up. The past four months ranked among the top five months in terms of fundraising volume of the past four years, with each month recording 1.2x to 2.2x higher volume than the same month in 2025 and 1.1x to 1.9x higher volume than the preceding month.
Small and mid-range checks performed best. Soft commitments below $150K were most common and generally retained or expanded their original value through to close, while mid-range checks between $150K and $250K were most likely to convert into legally binding commitments and converted faster than other initial check size ranges.
LP capital concentrated in seed-stage funds with specialized sector focus and leaner targets. Almost 90% of LP commitments in Q1-Q2 2026 went to funds with fund sizes below $15MM, around 70% went to seed-stage funds, while AI, Deeptech, and Healthcare were the most popular sectors.
The dominant narrative in venture capital over the past several years has been one of contraction. Emerging managers were described as facing the worst fundraising stretch in modern VC history, with LP capital said to be consolidating around tier-1 firms and first-time managers said to be struggling to fill even modest targets. The data tells a different story. 2025 was already a solid year for emerging VC fundraising, and the first half of 2026 has now extended that trajectory into record-breaking territory.
The question worth asking is not whether emerging managers can still raise capital. It is which check sizes and fund strategies are most associated with capital actually reaching close. The data tracked by Decile Group in Q1-Q2 2026 reveals clear patterns across each of these dimensions.
This article analyzes more than 1,000 PACTs, which are non-binding letters of intent signed by prospective LPs to indicate their desire to invest a specific amount of money into a venture capital fund, more than 1,000 LPAs, and over 250 emerging VC funds tracked through Q1-Q2 2026. The analysis covers three areas:
Scale and consistency of recent fundraising momentum in emerging VC.
Performance of LP check sizes in terms of conversion rates, speed, and value retention.
Concentration of LP capital across investment stages, sectors, and fund sizes.
Record-Breaking Fundraising Momentum
The past four months delivered the strongest sustained fundraising performance recorded in emerging VC over the past four years. The pattern was not driven by a single large close or an isolated month. It was visible across consecutive months and across multiple comparison frames.
Top Five Months in Four Years
The past four months ranked among the top five months in terms of fundraising volume recorded across the past four years. May 2026 sat in second place overall, closely followed by April 2026 in third, March 2026 in fourth, and February 2026 in fifth.
The concentration of high-performing months within a single four-month window is unusual. It suggests that fundraising strength is broad-based across the emerging fund ecosystem rather than concentrated in a small number of outlier funds, and that LP appetite for emerging managers is at its highest level in several years.
Year-on-Year Growth Across All Recent Months
Each of the past four months recorded between 1.2x and 2.2x higher fundraising volume than the same month in 2025. The year-on-year gap widened across the period, with February at the lower end and May at the upper end.
The widening year-on-year gap suggests that growth is not a one-off correction but is compounding through the year. 2025 was itself a healthy year for emerging VC fundraising, which makes the magnitude of the 2026 increase more notable. The pattern is consistent with a structural strengthening of LP appetite for emerging funds rather than a temporary catch-up effect.
Accelerating Month-on-Month Growth
Each of the past four months also recorded between 1.1x and 1.9x higher fundraising volume than the month immediately preceding it. Growth was sequential, with each month outperforming the last.
Sequential month-on-month acceleration is the clearest indicator that emerging VC fundraising is in a sustained upswing rather than a brief rebound. For emerging managers, the data suggests that the LP environment is more receptive than at any point in the past four years.
LP Check Sizes and Commitment Conversion
Headline fundraising volume reveals only part of the picture. The composition of LP commitments and how reliably those commitments converted into signed LPAs tells a more granular story about which check sizes were most associated with closes.
Small to Mid-Range Checks Dominated the Distribution
The average LP check size across the dataset was $159K. Checks between $50K and $150K represented the majority of all PACTs, followed by checks below $50K, and then checks between $150K and $250K. Checks above $250K, typical of institutional investors, were the least common. The distribution reflects the composition of the LP base for emerging funds. High-net-worth individuals and family offices typically write checks in the $50K to $250K range, and these LPs accounted for the bulk of soft commitments. Institutional LPs, which write the largest checks, retained a small share of overall PACT volume.
Mid-Range Checks Converted Most Reliably
PACTs between $150K and $250K converted into signed LPAs at the highest rate of any check size range, 1.2x to 2.4x higher than the rates observed in other ranges. Overall, soft commitments below $250K converted into LPAs at rates 1.5x to 2.4x higher than commitments above $250K. Mid-range checks appear to occupy the most reliable position in the conversion funnel. They are large enough to reflect genuine LP conviction, but small enough to remain within an LP's discretionary allocation rather than triggering an extended internal approval process. Larger checks are associated with longer diligence cycles and a higher probability of falling through before formalization.
Note: Conversion rates across the dataset were relatively modest in absolute terms, reflecting the recency of much of the data and the fact that a meaningful share of recent PACTs have not yet had time to convert.
Larger Checks Converted More Slowly
PACTs between $250K and $500K converted into LPAs in the shortest average time of 11 days, 1.1x to 1.8x faster than other check size ranges. Overall, soft commitments below $500K converted into LPAs 1.2x to 1.8x faster than commitments above $500K. The slowest conversion was observed among initial checks above $500K. The slower conversion of the largest checks is consistent with how institutional LPs and large family offices typically commit capital. Checks above $500K often require investment committee approval, legal review, and longer compliance cycles. For emerging managers, this means that the largest commitments are also the ones most likely to introduce timing risk into the close.
Note: Conversion speed figures are based only on PACTs that have already converted into LPAs and exclude PACTs still in the conversion window.
Small Checks Retained the Most Value
Checks below $50K converted into LPA amounts averaging 119% of their original PACT amount, 1.2x to 1.4x higher than other check size ranges. Overall, soft commitments below $150K converted into the same or larger LPA amounts on average, while soft commitments above $150K converted at between 85% and 96% of their original value. Smaller LPs were more likely to increase their commitment between the PACT and LPA stage, likely because their initial check left room to grow as the fund built momentum. Larger LPs more often moved in the opposite direction, trimming their commitment at close as final allocation decisions were made. Smaller and mid-range checks were therefore associated not only with higher conversion rates but also with more predictable capital at the close.
LP Investment Focus
Beyond check size dynamics, the composition of funds attracting LP capital provides insight into where investor interest concentrated in Q1–Q2 2026. Differences in sector focus, investment stage, and fund size reveal which types of funds were most successful in attracting commitments during the period.
AI, Deeptech, and Healthcare Led Sector Allocation
Emerging funds receiving LP commitments in Q1-Q2 2026 concentrated in a narrow set of sectors, with AI in the expected lead at almost twice the share of the following deeptech and healthcare sectors. Software, fintech, climate tech, B2B, consumer tech, diversity, impact, and blockchain each represented notable yet relatively smaller portions. Overall, only around 11% of funds receiving commitments were generalist, while the vast majority adopted a specialist sector focus, further reinforcing the continued shift toward specialization among emerging managers. The top 10 sectors targeted by funds launched in 2025 closely resembled the top 10 sectors represented among funds receiving commitments in 2026, suggesting broad alignment between emerging manager priorities and LP interest. The notable exception was consumer tech, which accounted for less than 1% of funds launched in 2025 but 4% of funds receiving commitments in 2026. While still representing a relatively small share overall, this overrepresentation may indicate stronger LP interest in consumer-focused opportunities than was reflected in fund launches the previous year.
Seed Stage Captured the Majority of LP Capital
Seed-stage funds dominated the funds receiving commitments more than usual, accounting for around two-thirds of all funded vehicles. Pre-seed funds followed at roughly one in four, while venture studio, accelerator, series A, and other strategies each represented relatively small shares. In 2025, 56% of launched emerging funds were seed funds, compared to 67% of funds receiving commitments in Q1-Q2 2026. Venture studio funds represented 7% of launched funds in 2025 but only 3% of funds receiving commitments in 2026. Accelerator funds represented 5% of launched funds in 2025 but only 2% of funds receiving commitments in 2026.
In Q1-Q2 2026, LPs appeared to concentrate around the most familiar seed-stage fund model. Venture studio and accelerator models, despite continuing to launch at meaningful rates, were associated with a disproportionately smaller share of LP capital. The latest pattern suggests that in the current environment LPs are favoring strategies with clearer comparable benchmarks and more established performance norms.
LPs Favored Funds Below $15MM
Almost 90% of emerging funds receiving commitments in Q1-Q2 2026 targeted fund sizes below $15MM. Funds targeting $5MM–$15MM accounted for 71% of all funded vehicles, while funds targeting less than $5MM represented around 16%. By comparison, funds targeting more than $15MM made up just 13% of the total, highlighting LP preference for smaller and mid-sized emerging funds. The concentration of LP capital in funds below $15MM is consistent with LP preference for emerging managers with leaner and more realistic targets. Smaller funds are easier to evaluate, faster to close, and present a clearer path to a first close milestone. Evidently discipline in fund sizing is increasingly associated with LP commitment, not a constraint to work around.
Key Takeaways
Fundraising conditions for emerging managers in 2026 are not what the prevailing industry narrative suggests. 2025 was already a strong year for emerging VC fundraising, and the past four months have extended that trajectory into record-breaking territory. The story is not one of recovery from a contraction that never materialized at this end of the market. It is one of acceleration on top of an already healthy base.
The data also clarifies what was not associated with successful closes in Q1-Q2 2026. Large checks above $250K, despite their headline appeal, were associated with lower conversion rates, slower conversion timelines, and lower value retention than smaller checks. Venture studio and accelerator models were associated with a disproportionately small share of LP capital relative to their share of launched funds. Fund targets above $15MM were the exception rather than the norm among funds reaching close.
What was associated with successful closes was a tighter and more disciplined model of emerging fund formation. Checks between $150K and $250K were the most likely to convert and did so quickly. Checks below $50K were more likely to convert into the same or larger LPA amounts than originally committed. Seed-stage funds with targets below $15MM, focused on AI, deeptech, or healthcare, accounted for the majority of capital reaching close. The funds reaching first close in this environment were not the largest or the most ambitious in scope. They were the most streamlined, focused, and relevant.
Key takeaways include:
Move while the window is open. Emerging VC fundraising is at its strongest level in four years, and active managers are currently raising into the most receptive LP environment since 2022.
Prioritize mid-range LPs. Soft commitments between $150K and $250K were the most likely to convert into signed LPAs and should be the focal point of investor cultivation.
Treat small checks as upside. Initial commitments below $50K were the only range to convert into larger LPA amounts on average than originally committed, making smaller LPs a source of value rather than a constraint.
Right-size the fund target. Funds below $15MM accounted for almost 90% of capital reaching close, and lean targets are increasingly aligned with where LP capital is concentrating.
Sharpen sector focus. AI, deeptech, and healthcare attracted most LPs, while consumer tech stood out as an underserved category where LP appetite outpaced manager supply.
The emerging manager category is not contracting. Capital is concentrating around a clear set of fundraising patterns, and the managers who align their fund strategy with those patterns will be best positioned to close in the second half of 2026.
VC Lab, the leading venture capital accelerator, empowers new and emerging managers worldwide to close ethical, high-performing funds in under six months. The program provides cutting-edge tools, expert mentorship, and a global network to raise more money in less time. Apply if you want to build a meaningful venture capital firm.
.png)
.png)
